image description image description

LATEST DIALOGUES Entangled Minds and Beyond – Dean Radin

Anecdotal reports of “experiential entanglements” – spontaneous mind-to-mind and mind-to-matter interactions – can be found throughout history, in all cultures, and at all educational levels. For over a century, such experiences have stimulated controlled scientific experiments to explore whether the anecdotes were best explainable as coincidence, confabulation, or genuine anomalies. Based on analysis of thousands of experiments published in peer-reviewed journals, the cumulative evidence is now clear: mind-to-mind and some forms of mind-matter interactions have been demonstrated beyond a reasonable doubt.

For the most part, this evidence is ignored or denied within the academic mainstream, probably because it implies that certain long-held assumptions about the nature of brain, mind and matter – assumptions that are inculcated in universities and repeated as fact in textbooks – are in some cases wrong and in others in need of radical revision. Dean Radin reviews the evidence for these entanglements, the resistance to the evidence, and the implications for a more mature science of the future.

This talk was recorded at SAND14. 

Related Dialogues

Please select the social network you want to share this page with:

We like you too :)
Science and Nonduality provides a forum where preeminent scientists, philosophers, teachers, artists and a large, international community gather to explore and advance the new paradigm emerging in spirituality, that is both grounded in cutting-edge science and consistent with the ancient wisdom of nonduality — the deep understanding of the interconnectedness of life.
close

2 Responses to “Entangled Minds and Beyond – Dean Radin”

  1. January 13, 2015 at 3:36 pm, Max Dauskardt said:

    From a Systemic Constellations point of view this is so encouragingly fitting….

  2. January 14, 2015 at 5:02 pm, andromedastudio said:

    Something not understood suggests that an attempt at more understanding should be undertaken. History suggests that there have been many well regarded scientific people who did not fully understand the subjects with which they were involved. Later discoveries revealed nuances that they did not notice. What we can understand is that these later discoveries might not have come about without the pioneering work of people who came before. Who is to say that we all are not “people who came before”…I.E. is there such a thing as the “bottom of the box”?

Leave a Reply

RELATED DIALOGUES

A Semantic Map of the Brain

Scientists at UC Berkeley have placed volunteers in an fMRI scanner and monitored blood flow in their brain activity for two hours, while having them listen to stories.  The result: they were able to map which…

Read More...

How the Brain Continually Changes and Reorganizes Itself

Until the 1970s, it was strongly believed in the emerging neuroscientific community that there were two certainties: 1) the brain and its neurons were fixed and could not be modified, and 2) it was impossible for…

Read More...
image description image description

Thanks To Our Sponsors