image description image description

LATEST DIALOGUES Searching for the Arrow of Time

earth

photo by Astronaut Koichi Wakata, Feb. 1, 2014.

Nothing in the laws of physics states that time cannot run backwards. The equations that determine how the earth revolves around the sun or how an apple falls from a tree work perfectly well whether time is running backwards or forwards. Still, in our own lives, we experience time as flowing from the past to the future. We remember the past. We grow older. We are born before we die.

Like us, the universe lives a uni-directional life, at least in some respects. From the Big Bang onward, the universe moves from a very orderly state to one that is very messy. It is this increase in disorder (in addition to our own personal experiences) that gives the appearance of time moving forward like an arrow headed in a single direction.

In a new paper, published last October in Physical Review Letters, researchers used gravity to show that this kind of unidirectional time can arise naturally, even when using laws of physics that work well in both temporal directions.

In a computer simulation, the researchers placed 1,000 particles in an infinite space, with one condition—they could only interact through gravity. Quantum physics was not allowed. Snapshots of these simulations showed that at some point the particles would always clump together in a ball with the smallest possible complexity. After that, complexity increased along both directions of time.

This simulation mirrors the increase of complexity seen in the universe from the point of the Big Bang onward. Based on this, say the researchers, it also means that the universe has one past with two possible futures, like two temporal arrows moving in opposite directions. To an observer in each universe, time would flow in a single direction toward a more disordered universe.

Their simulation also hints at an eternal universe, one leading in two directions from the same point of minimum complexity—with gravity propelling the single-headed arrow of time. The researchers have more work to do in order to show that their simulation is a good approximation of the actual universe, but they are confident in their approach.

“It’s the only clear, simple idea that’s been put forward to explain the basis of the arrow of time,” physicist Julian Barbour, a coauthor of the study, told Science News.

Related Dialogues

Please select the social network you want to share this page with:

We like you too :)
Shawn Radcliffe is a science writer, yoga instructor and creator of fiction and humor. He has written about science, health, meditation and yoga for Healthline.com, Men's Fitness, Greater Good and more. He also tackles the humorous implications of spirituality and science on his blog, Branáin - Ravenously Curious.
close

Leave a Reply

RELATED DIALOGUES

Modern Physics is Stagnating, Not in Crisis

Over the past century, the total number of physicists has grown exponentially, as has the number of papers published. In spite of all that “progress,” modern physics is stagnating, writes physicist and science writer Sabine Hossenfelder…

Read More...

Retrocausality: Can the Present Affect the Past?

  The present moment is the source of a chain of interdependence. This absolute point includes all changing phenomena, all impermanent existence, the entire cosmos.  ~ Taisen Deshimaru The entire field of becoming is open and…

Read More...
image description image description

Thanks To Our Sponsors